Analysis of Students' Mathematical Reasoning in Triangles by Learning Style Preferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v5i2.2120Keywords:
Auditory Learners, Kinesthetic Learners, Mathematical Reasoning, Secondary Education, Visual LearnersAbstract
This study analyzes students' mathematical reasoning abilities concerning triangles and special lines, considering their individual learning styles. The qualitative case study was conducted at Khalifah Boarding Junior High School, involving three grade VIII students representing visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. The selection of these students was based on their learning style preferences identified through a questionnaire. Data collection included mathematical ability tests and interviews, which were then analyzed by triangulating answer sheet observations and interview findings. Initial data revealed a distribution of 50% visual learners, 42% auditory learners, and 8% kinesthetic learners. Subjects were purposively selected based on the highest scores in each learning style group. The subjects demonstrated differences in understanding and approaching problem-solving, influenced by their learning styles. This study highlights specific challenges and recommendations for each subject, emphasizing the importance of a tailored learning approach to improve mathematical understanding and problem-solving skills. The research underscores the significance of recognizing and accommodating diverse learning styles to optimize students' academic achievements in mathematics.
References
Aprilianti, Y., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematik siswa SMP pada materi segiempat dan segitiga. Journal on Education, 1(2), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i2.167
Cindyana, E. A., Alim, J. A., & Noviana, E. (2022). Pengaruh pembelajaran berdiferensiasi berbantuan materi ajar geometri berbasis RME terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa kelas 3 sekolah dasar. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 6(4), 1179-1187. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v6i4.8837
Dahlan, A. H. (2018). Pengembangan model pembelajaran pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI) untuk meningkatkan ketertarikan belajar matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 1(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol1iss1pp8-14
Damayanti, P. A., & Qohar, A. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika interaktif berbasis powerpoint pada materi kerucut. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i2.16814
Lenaini, I. (2021). Teknik pengambilan sampel purposive dan snowball sampling. Historis: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.v6i1.4075
Leonard, L. (2013). Kajian peran konsistensi diri terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. 3(2), 97–104. httR://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i2.116
Marfu’ah, S., Zaenuri, Z., Masrukan, M., & Walid, W. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. In A. N. Nurcahyono, H. Sutarto & B. E. Susilo (Eds.), PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 5, pp. 50-54. Universitas Negeri Semarang
Mukhlis, M., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, S., & Irawati, S. (2024). Students’ Thinking Literacy Process in Mathematical Problem-Solving. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2337–2345. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7676
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O. Ruddock, G. J., O'Sullivan, C. Y. & Preuschoft, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 Mathematics Framework. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Nur’azizzah, N., Pramuditya, S. A., & Rosita, C. D. (2023). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa melalui pendekatan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. JUMLAHKU: Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah STKIP Muhammadiyah Kuningan, 9(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.33222/jumlahku.v9i1.2744
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in focus. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/aa9237e6-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/a89c90e1-es.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pradestya, R., Imswatama, A., & Balkist, P. S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan kognitif pada langkah-langkah pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis-matematis. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 5(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v5i1.1723
Purbaningrum, K. A. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa smp dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2029
Soleha, S., Rasiman, R., & Purwosetiyono, F. D. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMK. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v1i5.4460
Sundayana, R. (2016). Kaitan Antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Garut, 5, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.372
Supit, D., Melianti, M., Lasut, E. M. M., & Tumbel, N. J. (2023). Gaya belajar visual, auditori, kinestetik terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6994-7003. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1487
Susandi, A. D. (2020). Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Sigma, 6(1), 26-41. p://dx.doi.org/10.53712/sigma.v6i1.864
Yuwanita, I., Dewi, H. I., & Wicaksono, D. (2020). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPA. Instruksional, 1(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.24853/instruksional.1.2.152-158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rakha Pradestya, Sudirman Sudirman, Ardi Dwi Susandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
